I was fortunate enough to attend a presentation recently given by a CEO about the strategic role HR has played in the success of his organization. And he has a very successful company. Although his HR department has always gotten his full support, I realized while he spoke that there must be things HR can do to earn that support, even if you don’t necessarily have it now.
One of the things that struck me most was the value he placed on the trends he was informed of by HR regarding his employees. He counts on HR to be aware of who is doing a poor job of managing, what the employees are frustrated about in the resources they are provided, how the employees feel about where the company is going, how the employees perceive their individual career development – really everything that the employees had to say. Is it possible that you have this information but never thought to put it together in a cohesive way, present it to the owners or executives, and recommend solutions?
Another area where he values HR’s is their creativity in coming up with ideas that make employees happy. These things range from a diner within the building because traffic is hellatious and there is nowhere within walking distance to eat, to the implementation of a “quiet room” for those on break who just need a few moments to decompress in solitude, to an employee recognition program where employees can publicly give kudos to each other via the intranet. These are just a small number of the programs this company has in place that he credits directly to HR. Is it possible that you know the different things that would make your employees happier but haven’t made these recommendations under the assumption that nothing would come of it? Can you show in dollars and cents the impact small changes may make in terms of production? Or maybe how production is impacted when morale is down?
A third example he mentioned involves HR recommending a different hiring process that aligns with the company values. HR realized that their most productive employees shared the mindset that fit into the culture of the organization. The technical skills matter of course, but they suggested that the core qualities that align with the mission statement ultimately end up being more important. HR recommended 16 personality traits that must be present regardless of skill set because they accumulated examples where the top talent had a derogatory effect on the team and ultimately the company. Because of the data HR had, they were able to change the hiring process to focus more on these traits than on skills and show why this would ultimately mean more production in the long run. And it has. Do you have this information regarding who ends up being a good employee and who doesn’t? Have you considered recommending a new hiring process based on what you see?
Many seem to think that without the CEO supporting the value of HR, Human Resources can never be a strategic partner in an organization. But have you ever tried to earn that support? This particular CEO explained that he has no time for whiners and what he values most is not only a description of a problem but a recommendation on how to fix it. If you take the approach that you have information that is helpful to the company, support it with data, and then suggest a solution, will you then find yourself with a “seat at the table”?
Maybe it’s time to stop focusing on the lack of support for HR and instead take the initiative to make HR invaluable. I would love to hear examples of anyone who has tried and what response you received.




Comments
Leave a comment Trackback