I’ve been reading an interesting conversation on LinkedIn regarding the differences between talent and competency.  What are the differences and what is more important when building a team? 

In my opinion, talent is something innate – a particular strength or instinct that can’t be learned, at least not easily.  It is almost a certain mindset or way of looking at things.  A competency is more task-related – an ability one possesses that has been learned, studied, or practiced, and ultimately mastered.  How easily this was accomplished probably has a lot to do with the level of talent.  Do you agree? 

When searching for great employees, which matters more?  Does it depend on the type of job?  When interviewing, what tools do you use to evaluate the difference?  Does is matter whether or not there is potential growth opportunity, and if so, do you seek candidates with competencies if there is not much growth potential and those with talent if you’re hoping to expand their role?  Would you hire someone who can get the job done but may not have other talents your company could use to grow?  Or do you specifically seek employees who can not only get the job done, but bring more to the table?

In my mind, a competency can be taught (and learned) but a talent is a little something extra that should be encouraged and cultivated.  I would think this is where you get your “star” employees.  Is it a coincidence too, that people tend to be good at the things they love?  Is talent then related to passion and how does this fit in with recruiting great employees?  If an employee has a passion and talent for something, wouldn’t you imagine that they would be more motivated, engaged and generally happier doing their job?  And doesn’t this minimize some of the concerns HR has to address with the employees thereby making your job easier?  Couldn’t you also assume competency?

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts in the comments.