Recently, I was discussing HR positions and the different duties that go with that title and it occurred to me how many areas of the business this department manages. This led to the following train of thought and many questions. I would love to know your thoughts on this topic and any feedback or answers you could provide in the comments.
I’m sure I’m missing some, but a list of objectives of human resources off the top of my head are benefits, recruiting, interviewing, hiring, employee concerns and complaints, downsizing, retention, talent management, on-boarding, policy, law, employee paperwork, and possibly payroll. Then within some of these areas, whole departments can exist. For example, within the benefits department there could be a need for an HR Generalist to manage health & wellness, 401k, disability, FMLA, workers compensation and a host of other areas.
How in the world does a business determine how many employees it needs in Human Resources? It seems like it would make sense that a set ratio exists, kind of like when my kids started school and we were looking into student/teacher ratios. But what would that ratio be and how is it determined when there are things like applicant tracking systems and human resource management software that would affect that number? And then we all know the age-old argument about having a seat at the table and being strategic – how does that tie in? Does all this depend on what role the owners, board or executives expect HR to play within the organization?
When someone decides to pursue a career in human resources, what does that mean? Does everyone have their own definition? Did you know what you wanted to specialize in when you started or did you end up in a certain area because of experience? I posted previously about HR using a lot of buzzwords and the confusion that results, but the term human resources sure seems awfully broad.
As I was researching the different areas and seeking a flow chart that would explain all this (I didn’t find one), I came across this article about the responsibility of HR employees. This made me think even more about the challenge of working in HR. If you read this article, you can see an example of how the author, an HR Director, was held accountable for things she had little to no control over. Doesn’t operating in this manner ultimately hurt the business?
How does a company figure out not only that it has the right number of HR professionals, but that they are responsible for the things they should be?
Please share thoughts and experiences in the comments.










